In message <20030601.191737.46635560.uebayasi@pultek.co.jp>
	on Sun, 01 Jun 2003 19:17:37 +0900 (JST),
	Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi@pultek.co.jp> wrote:
> > I found that previous canna package was 3.6.1 (== 3.6p1) and now isn't
> > 3.6.3 but 3.6p3.  For consistency is it better to change 3.6.3?
> 
> This is a mistake.  It's It's okay to change back to 3.6.3.
> 
> (But I prefer '3.6p3' if this correction brings only small problems.)
Is there any package using p[1-9]?  Most of them use digit only.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>