--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 06:16:02PM +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:04:50 +0200 Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> >=20
> > wouldn't be sysutils/anacron more appropriate?  it doesn't really
> > fint into "Clocks, calendars, daily planners and other time related
> > applications" description.
>=20
> I doubted a lot for this one but... it seemed to fit as "time related
> application" properly.  And sysutils contains 200 packages, while time
> is around 50, so I thought it could be better to put it into time.

i tend to disagree with your argumentation.  the amount of packages in a
category is irrelevant.  it's more of a "system utility used for task
scheduling" than time-related application.  i think it makes a bad
precedent.  for prior art see e.g., wip/vixie-cron.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAeYexiwjDDlS8cmMRAsq7AJ45rfYj0/Hr1wLX6UexC6np4Ds9dwCfaJvh
c2XHkfy2+R9TxQHeTfSVAi4=
=Gt2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI--