On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 08:43:07PM +1100, grant beattie wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:38:33PM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
> 
> > The similar problem exists binary packages for apache and apache2.
> 
> this is different because they live in separate directories, so
> both are built in bulk builds.

I think what Kembe-san implied was that we don't get binary packages
of the PHP module for both apache and apache2.

But anyway, as soon as we use options.mk or the like, we loose on
binary packages availability.  The only solution is to provide a set
of packages that represents a default combination.  In that sense,
having only ap-php doesn't looks to me as the most abusive default.
It's far from a strong opinion though.

Quentin Garnier.