On 10/19/05, Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:58:18 +0200
> "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Interesting... I see this too.  And you, Juan?  Maybe it failed for
> > you when installing
> > in gnome-base, and your "fixed" with this no-op change (because you
> > probably retried installation from within gnome-themes)?  Do we have
> > a problem in how INSTALL_MAKE_FLAGS works?
>
> Yes, same here. I was building gnome-base and gnome-themes failed
> to install, if I remember correctly ${INSTALL} was empty.

I doubt it.  The change you made can't be fixing your problem (and if it do=
es,
it is really, really strange).  INSTALL_DATA_DIR is derived from INSTALL,
thus it should be empty in this case too.  Furthermore, the former macro
only adds some arguments to set ownership and permissions of files...
just check the contents of that variable and compare them to "${INSTALL} -d=
".

You should revert that change... although I don't care much if you do becau=
se
the package is horribly broken at the moment and needs real fixing; just ch=
eck
the PLIST and you'll see why....

Cheers,

--
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com>
http://www.livejournal.com/users/jmmv/
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/