On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:26:39AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >       pkgsrc/devel/bmake: Makefile
> 
> Part of bootstrap. Should be marked explictly broken for non-bootstrap
> usage. On the same note, we should remove the special status of tnftp
> when it is not build as part of bootstrap.

Hm, but why shouldn't it build outside of bootstrap too?

> >       pkgsrc/graphics/gri: Makefile
> 
> ghostscript issue, I was hoping this is fixed.

Hm, is it?
Pull the fix up to 2006Q4 and the tag can be removed :)

> >       pkgsrc/lang/swi-prolog-packages: Makefile
> 
> Interactive (need X11)

Perhaps the interactive (X11) part can be put into another package?

> >       pkgsrc/security/botan: Makefile
> 
> Feature test, not sure how to best handle this.

Disable it?

> >       pkgsrc/sysutils/nvnet: Makefile
> 
> Replaced with nfe, should be removed?

Probably. What do you think, manu?

> >       pkgsrc/sysutils/strace: Makefile
> 
> Maybe mark linux-only?

Christos' intention was it that it works on NetBSD too.
And perhaps it does, on some releases...

> > 	pkgsrc/databases/java-db3: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/devel/gdb: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/emulators/twin: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/graphics/denemo: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/multimedia/gmencoder: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/multimedia/gmplayer: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/net/netsaint-plugins: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/textproc/po4a: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/www/spfc: Makefile
> > 	pkgsrc/x11/xdm3d: Makefile
> 
> I object those, as they build fine at least on DragonFly and most also
> with modular Xorg.

The test case currently is the latest NetBSD release, i.e. NetBSD-3.1/i386.
I'm aware that some of them build on NetBSD-current, too.

They are not marked as BROKEN, so I'd let the tags stay.

Or we should reconsider what our intention with the tags is...
 Thomas