On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:57:17AM -0500, Blair Sadewitz wrote:
> That's what I always though, but I figured I was wrong because they
> were installed that way in the distribution.  If they should be marked
> executable, why doesn't NetBSD do so?

If shared libraries are marked as 'x', then something sensible has to happen
if you actually try to run them.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk