Matthias Drochner wrote:
>> What about FreeBSD and DragonFly? Both use OpenPAM as well.
> 
> There are 2 open questions for me:
> -Do they already have a mechanism which fulfills the same purpose?
>  (eg Debian has)
> -What are the shared library naming/version conventions? Afaik this
>  is not part of the PAM specification. NetBSD needs a ".0", but
>  I have no idea what's needed on other systems.

I think both the Linux PAM and OpenPAM implementations require that you 
name the module in the config file, so the naming convention shouldn't 
matter.

	Cheers,

	-- Johnny Lam <jlam@pkgsrc.org>