Alistair Crooks wrote:

> One for the licence mavens amongst us: can we make the
> BSD licences into one of:
> 
> 	MIT
> 	BSD-3clause
> 	BSD-4clause

Makes sense to me...

> And, secondly, why is it GNU-GPL-v[23], the "GNU-" bit is
> unnecessary. Or maybe we should call the BSD ones

I'd call it "GPL-v[23]" (and LGPL-v[23]).

> 	Berkeley-BSD-4clause

IMO this is a too long name...

Martti