On 16.08.2018 14:33, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:34:38AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 16.08.2018 05:25, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:33:12AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>>> On 09.08.2018 15:52, Jonathan Perkin wrote: >>>>> Module Name: pkgsrc >>>>> Committed By: jperkin >>>>> Date: Thu Aug 9 13:52:49 UTC 2018 >>>>> >>>>> Modified Files: >>>>> pkgsrc/lang/llvm: Makefile >>>>> >>>>> Log Message: >>>>> llvm: Add compiler-rt to list of packages to sync. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I propose to include there libBlocksRuntime and actually merge shared >>>> part of compiler-rt and libBlocksRuntime. They both come from compiler-rt. >>> >>> That request makes no sense. >>> >>> Joerg >>> >> >> Why? We are already doing similar things of sharing common package rules >> e.g. in lemon & sqlite3. > > There is no sharing. There is not even an upstream build system for the > blocks runtime. > > Joerg > This is correct, the same as lemon. Both packages will share common distfile and just that. With llvm upgrades we will get upgraded libBlocksRuntime that will remain an independent package.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature