Subject: Re: Documentation quality of pkgsrc
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher <stefan@net-tex.de>
List: pkgsrc-users
Date: 04/25/2007 18:22:08
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Also sprach Jeremy C. Reed (reed@reedmedia.net)
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Ulrich Habel wrote:
>=20
> > For example:
> >=20
> > The documentation didn't mention the scripts mkbinarykit or
> > mkbootstrapkit - do you know what they are for? (yes, I know it -
> > thanks)
>=20
> mkbootstrapkit has been removed. It was a script to make a source=20
> bootstrap kit.
>=20
> Yes, mkbinarykit should be documented.
It's a common problem that tools, libs or whatever are submitted and
work fine, but are not documented.=20
In my opinion, there should be a rule that new programs or libs etc.
should also be documented.=20
A *good* man page might be sufficient for this as a first base.
To read the source code is not an option.
However, having no docs makes a good tool useless for most users, so a
policy for docs is required.
--=20
PGP FPR: CF74 D5F2 4871 3E5C FFFE 0130 11F4 C41E B3FB AE33
http://www.net-tex.de =20
http://www.cryptomancer.de
--=20
Jeder wird als Faust geboren, um alles zu erfassen, alles zu erproben, alle=
s=20
auszudr=FCcken. Da=DF Faust Gelehrter wurde, daf=FCr sorgten die Fehler sei=
ner=20
Vorg=E4nger und seiner Zeitgenossen.=20
Boris Pasternak, Doktor Schiwago
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFGL4AwEfTEHrP7rjMRAjXwAKC1VqaE4ljql7KUIMyWHkw9ruf8nACgly2g
rIur3NA7y1q7MjOqjlBTE5E=
=cXp8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--