On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Richard PALO wrote:
Le 21/11/14 20:32, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
>Can you give some real details? While there is some possible
>fallout, a rebuild of the gcc package itself shouldn't strictly be
>necessary.
>
>Joerg
>
SunOS 5.11 with pkgsrc abi=32
From an system prior:
>richard@devzone:~$ find /opt/local -type d -name 'i[34]86*' find :
>impossible de lire le répertoire /opt/local/etc/cups/ssl :
>Permission refusée find : impossible de lire le répertoire
>/opt/local/etc/cups/ssl : Permission refusée
>/opt/local/gcc49/libexec/gcc/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/gcc49/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/gcc49/lib/amd64/go/4.9.2/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/gcc49/lib/go/4.9.2/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/gcc49/lib/gcc/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/gcc49/lib/gcc/i386-sun-solaris2.11/4.9.2/plugin/include/config/i386
>/opt/local/gcc49/include/c++/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/i386-sun-solaris2.11
>/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.20.0/i386-solaris
>/opt/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.20.0/i386-solaris
gcc shouldn't matter as long as you have don't try to make replace. Perl
might. I am not that attached to the i486 part of the change, so if it
creates too much trouble, that part can easily go back.