pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
From: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:50:54 +0000

This is a violent hack, but rust builds are going to be a lot less flaky
on pkgbuild if we introduce

MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no

to all Rust using things, on netbsd only.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Next by Date: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Previous by Thread: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Next by Thread: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index