Re: Add lang/openjdk21-bin?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

"J. Lewis Muir" <jlmuir%imca-cat.org@localhost> writes:

> I see lang/openjdk21, but not lang/openjdk21-bin.  Is there openness to
> adding lang/openjdk21-bin?

lang/openjdk-bin is 21.  So I don't understand your question.

If you mean "should openjdk-bin be renamed to openjdk21-bin, so that's
clearer?", then perhaps.  If you mean "should there be all three of
openjdk{11,17,21}-bin?" then I don't know if anybody wants them, but
there's no doctrine against it.  Just the usual if we're going to
version, version all and don't flip back and forther.

> My use case is that I'd like to create a package that depends on Java
> version 21 because that's the latest LTS version, and I'm nervous to
> depend on lang/openjdk21 because it's not certified according to the
> warning in its DESCR file that says the following:
>
>   This package is NOT certified to be compatible with any Java standard.
>   Use at own risk.

Are you working in an environment that has audits?