Re: CATEGORIES=wip?

To: Georg Schwarz <georg.schwarz%freenet.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: CATEGORIES=wip?
From: Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:05:05 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:17:44PM +0200, Georg Schwarz wrote:
> Is CATEGORIES=wip
> a) mandatory
> b) a good idea
> or
> c) a bad idea
> 
> for packages which are part of WIP?

Good question.  It is a bad idea to only have 'wip' in the categories,
it should at least contain one suggested category for the import.

The only reason I could think of where 'wip' in the CATEGORIES
would be a good idea is for bulk builds. I don't see this
as a strong argument.

I'd suggest not putting 'wip' there.

Cheers,
 Thomas

-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss

References:
- CATEGORIES=wip?
  - From: Georg Schwarz

Prev by Date: Re: twisted2 doc packages
Next by Date: Re: CATEGORIES=wip?
Previous by Thread: CATEGORIES=wip?
Next by Thread: Re: CATEGORIES=wip?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index