pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- To: elvstone%gmail.com@localhost
- Subject: Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
- Date: 14 Sep 2005 19:49:02 -0400 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.libmemcache+= libmemcache>=1.4.0.b5
In theory, pkg version compare gets beta right, but that looks odd.
BUILDLINK_DEPENDS should (IMHO) really be about API version, but in
practice it's also a bit about whether a particular version is
adequate. So if the API hasn't changed recently, I'd depend on the
oldest version with the right API. I view someone needing to update a
package because it's old as a separate issue from a depending package
refusing to use it. But I suspect my view is a bit unorthodox.
--
Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index