Re: suse linux32 packages

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:38:38AM +0200, Mihai Chelaru wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> 
> > I don't exactly like this. I'd prefer a knob for emulators/suse100_* to
> > add _32b to the package name and use the i386 version. That avoids the
> > double maintainance.
> 
> This is exactly what I have in mind. This is a diff for suse100_linux and
> suse100_base. Is this OK ?

More something like

DISTNAME=               suse${BIT_DISTNAME}_base-${SUSE_VERSION}
COMMENT=                Linux ${BIT_COMMENT}compatibility package

I want to avoid the conditionals all over the place if possible.

Joerg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss