Re: {svn, cvs}-package.mk (Re: [PATCH] cache filename change for mk/git-package.mk

[Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:37:59PM +0900, Makoto Fujiwara wrote:
> More than years ago, I'v written attached mail asking
> cache-file name change for git-package.mk
> 
> Today, I've noticed wip/llvm and wip/clang use the different
> name on the equivalent cache file (by svn-package.mk).
> 
>  20998854 Sep 28 20:04 distfiles/svn-packages/clang-llvm-2011-09-28.tar.gz
>  20976690 Sep 28 17:22 distfiles/svn-packages/llvm-llvm-2011-09-28.tar.gz
> 
> I think we had better change the cache file name as like
> git-package.mk.
> 
> Please give me the opinion, thanks a lot,

It's fine until we get two trees that are called "src" or something
common like that :)
 Thomas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss