pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: wip/dri
My pkglint version is either 4.103 or 4.105.
But I did not straight out this problem yet. Let me report
later, thank you.
| To: Makoto Fujiwara <makoto%ki.nu@localhost>
| From: Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>
| Subject: Re: CVS commit: wip/dri
| Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:42:49 +0100
| Message-ID: <20111202144249.GQ10832%danbala.tuwien.ac.at@localhost>
> > N wip/dri/distinfo
>
> It seemed to me that wip/dri/distinfo file is not necessary
> for now. The package ignores the file but pkglint flags
> distinfo is wrong.
>
> (pkglint does not seem to pursue following lines)
>
> (..wip/dri)% grep include Makefile
> .include "../../wip/gl/Makefile.common"
>
> (..wip/dri)% grep -i distinfo ../../wip/gl/Makefile.common
> DISTINFO_FILE= ${.CURDIR}/../../wip/gl/distinfo
>
> Shall I remove wip/dri/distinfo ?
wiz> I don't know what version of pkglint you use -- I don't get a warning:
/usr/pkgsrc/wip/dri> rm distinfo
/usr/pkgsrc/wip/dri> pkglint
wiz> ERROR: Makefile: All packages must define their LICENSE.
wiz> WARN: ../../wip/gl/patches/patch-aa:3: Comment expected.
wiz> WARN: ../../wip/gl/patches/patch-ab:3: Comment expected.
wiz> 1 errors and 2 warnings found.
---
Makoto Fujiwara,
Chiba, Japan, Narita Airport and Disneyland prefecture.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index