Subject: Re: Support for newer versions of the Arcin IDE interface?
To: None <port-acorn32@netbsd.org>
From: Peter Bell <peter@bellfamily.org.uk>
List: port-acorn32
Date: 11/08/2002 02:14:12
In message <a166ed914b.peter@riscpc01.reading.fourcom.com>
          Peter Bell <peter@bellfamily.org.uk> wrote:

> In message <9a2ce7914b.peter@riscpc01.reading.fourcom.com>
>           Peter Bell <peter@bellfamily.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > So, I'm just about to move my 40GB IBM across onto the ARCIN and boot
> > from that.  Assuming, of course, that the bootloader is happy with the
> > ARCIN.
> 
> Hmmm, sorry to follow myself up, but . . .

Arghhh, and again!

> Yes, the bootloader will load a kernel from the ARCIN interface via
> UNIXFS, but it then panics in exactly the same way as it did with the
> Conner drive attached - waiting for irq.
> 
> However, if the same kernel is loaded from an ADFS device, it runs
> fine and the IBM drive attached to the ARCIN can be accessed perfectly
> well - even via PCNFS.

Nope, it's not to do with where the kernel loads from, it happens when
the root partition and/or other options are given to the BtNetBSD
command.  IOW, if I let the system prompt for the root device, then it
comes up and runs perfectly happily.

> Have you managed to boot the kernel off an ARCIN-connected drive and,
> if so, are any of the changes you've made in current likely to
> be related to this?

I think that question is still relevant - perhaps a delay is needed
after the card is detected?

-- 
Peter Bell - peter@bellfamily.org.uk