Subject: Re: Tekram dc390f and AS200
To: Antti Kantee <pooka@iki.fi>
From: Nick <nmanisca@vt.edu>
List: port-alpha
Date: 07/09/2000 10:08:40
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 11:26:37AM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Fri Jul 07 2000 at 19:53:55 -0500, Dave Huang wrote:
>
> > > I note that this looks very similar to the output from "ncr" but not
> > > quite. I wonder if the "ncr" driver is reporting MHz as MB/s when it
> > > should not.
> >
> > I switched from ncr to siop too, and don't have any old boot logs lying
> > around... I do remember it reporting 40MB/s for my UW drives though.
> > However, this was with 1.4X or so; perhaps 1.4.2's driver is reporting
> > it incorrectly. However, I really doubt it, since it does say 100ns
> > cycle time.
>
> Here is the output with ncr for a uw controller:
>
> sd0(ncr0:1:0): WIDE SCSI (16 bit) enabled
> sd0(ncr0:1:0): 40.0 MB/s (50 ns, offset 16)
>
> (Haven't switched to siop yet because of tagged queuing..)
Aha! So is this a Tekram DC-390F on an AlphaStation 200? I am wondering
if some some reason mine is not fully compatible or something?
Also the fact that SRM recognizes it and I boot from it would not have
any impact would it? SRM seems to think it is a fast/narrow controller,
could it be that SRM 'sets' it as fast and somehow the kernel driver is
not able to set it up to ultra?
I am going to browse the driver source and see if there is an obvious way
to maybe force ultra? Any thoughts on this?
Nick Maniscalco