Subject: Re: Any changes to COMPAT_OSF1 since 1.5?
To: Nathan J. Williams <nathanw@MIT.EDU>
From: Kevin P. Neal <kpneal@pobox.com>
List: port-alpha
Date: 02/22/2001 00:40:23
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:30:23PM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> "Kevin P. Neal" <kpneal@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Have there been any changes to DUNIX emulation since 1.5? I've got
> > "Digital UNIX V4.0E (Rev. 1091); Wed Oct 6 16:40:55 EDT 1999",
> > NetBSD/alpha 1.5, and I'm trying to run netscape.
>
> Netscape 4.7 has mostly worked for me through the 1.5 cycle and up
> until very recently in -current (and that problem is being worked on).
I upgraded to this version:
navigator-v476-us.alpha-dec-osf4.0.tar.gz
I get the same failure as with the earlier version. Is it possible I'm
using a different version of DUnix than everyone else?
> > 4112 real-netscape CALL classcntl(0x8,0x22,0x1fffff0d0,0)
> > 4112 real-netscape RET classcntl -1 errno 78 Function not implemented
> > 4112 real-netscape CALL getuid
> > 4112 real-netscape RET getuid 100/0x64
> > 4112 real-netscape CALL stat(0x248009b0,0x1ffffd3f8)
> > 4112 real-netscape NAMI "/emul/osf1/usr/sbin/class_daemon"
> > 4112 real-netscape NAMI "/emul/osf1"
> > 4112 real-netscape NAMI "/emul/osf1/usr/sbin/class_daemon"
> > 4112 real-netscape RET stat 0
> > 4112 real-netscape CALL #201 (unimplemented msgget)
> > 4112 real-netscape PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL
> >
> > Should I send-pr this?
>
> Is it dying immediately at startup, or later when you try to do
Startup. send-pr?
For kicks, here's acroread3:
28230 acroread RET close 0
28230 acroread CALL close(0x3)
28230 acroread RET close 0
28230 acroread CALL getpagesize
28230 acroread RET getpagesize 8192/0x2000
28230 acroread CALL obreak(0x14004a7c0)
28230 acroread RET obreak 0
28230 acroread CALL [-10]
28230 acroread PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL
28230 acroread NAMI "acroread.core"
Acroread4:
28362 acroread RET close 0
28362 acroread CALL close(0x3)
28362 acroread RET close 0
28362 acroread CALL getpagesize
28362 acroread RET getpagesize 8192/0x2000
28362 acroread CALL obreak(0x140064b50)
28362 acroread RET obreak 0
28362 acroread CALL [-10]
28362 acroread PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL
28362 acroread NAMI "acroread.core"
Are those Mach system calls it loses on? Did I hear those will never ever
be supported by NetBSD?
--
Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
'Concerns about "rights" and "ownership" of domains are inappropriate.
It is appropriate to be concerned about "responsibilities" and "service"
to the community.' -- RFC 1591, page 4: March 1994