James Chacon wrote:

> Let's try this one instead. Less hacky overall I think and w. it all boot
> blocks build again (basically we're back to the same outputs as binutils 2.14
> I beleive)

I can confirm that these bootblocks work (at least, bootxx_ffs and boot
do).

Simon.
--
Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Support and Service:         http://www.wasabisystems.com/