Port-alpha archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
3.x end of life
Having recently received a notice via netbsd-announce declaring 3.x is
now end of life, I guess the time has come to upgrade my DEC 1000A
netbsd-3 install to something that is still supported. My preference
is to upgrade to 5.x, but I have some questions:
1) I vaguely remember some mention that the move to GCC 4.x in NetBSD
4 onwards yielded some problems building a complete distribution on
alpha due to GCC 4.x being more "memory hungry" than 3.x. I have only
128 MB of RAM in my DEC 1000A and 256 MB of swap space. Will this be
sufficient to build a NetBSD 4.x or 5.x world natively? How much swap
space need I add to build netbsd-5 successfully?
2) The NetBSD install on this machine dates back quite some way (to
some 1.x version; I forget exactly which). Anyway, it originated in
an era where disks were a lot smaller than they are today.
Accordingly, my partitions are smaller than would be common on
contemporary sized drives. I'm worried that if the standard NetBSD
4.x or 5.x install is larger than 3.x that my root partition may not
be large enough. Does anyone know how much 4.x or 5.x differs in size
relative to netbsd-3? Here is what I have currently (which is ample
space for 3.x):
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/raid0a 126M 44M 75M 37% /
/dev/raid2a 126M 55M 65M 45% /var
/dev/raid2d 1.5G 957M 514M 65% /usr
/dev/raid3a 3.9G 1.5G 2.2G 40% /home
/dev/sd1a 1.9G 256M 1.6G 13% /usr/pkgsrc
/dev/sd1d 1.9G 1.0G 815M 56% /usr/src
/dev/sd3d 2.2G 790M 1.3G 36% /usr/obj
(I also have a 4.3G drive I can use as a temporary build area.)
As you can see, the system is set up with much of it configured as
either RAID-1 or RAID-5 under RAIDframe. I'd hate to have to re-
partition with larger partitions because I'd likely lose that ability
given the physical drives in there. BTW, the system's only production
role is as a slave nameserver and so doesn't need much in the way of
future expansion: just enough to contain the base OS, really.
3) Is it possible to upgrade successfully directly from netbsd-3 to
netbsd-5? Or, do you have to upgrade to some version of 4.x as an
interim step? Does anyone have any recommended path they have tried
that has been successful? (Right now, it is running netbsd-3.) I
have limited physical access to this system, so I hope not to have to
spend much, if any, time in single user mode if I can help it.
Any advice, gotchas, or hints from personal upgrade experiences are
gratefully appreciated.
Cheers,
Paul.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index