Re: static link csh/tcsh dumps core

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Mar 11,  6:17pm, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: static link csh/tcsh dumps core

| On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:10:11PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > It makes sense. I am just wondering what the the pros and cons doing it this
| > way.
| 
| No real pros vs. my first patch - I just like to fully understand what is
| going on before fixing anything, and this sounds like a hot trace.
| 
| Actually there is no 100% guarantee that longjmp and setjmp need to end
| up close enough to share the GP value (though it is unlikely in case
| where link time optimization hits one to fail for the other).

So in the first way it will have the GP from the setjmp() context, in the
second case it will have the GP from the longjmp() context? Does it make
a difference?

christos