YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> (except that it probably ought to be moved into x86.)
>> attached version for x86. is it okay? (tested on amd64 only)
>>
>> notice that I didn't add check_pa_acc() prototype to any header in
>> x86/include because I didn't know where it was appropriate...
> 
> i meant to move the most of mem_clusters management code
> into, say, x86/memcluster.c.
> (blame me for not doing so when writing i386 version. :-)

:)

well that I'd rather not mess with (at least for now); what's the
verdict on the two patches posted? is either of them okay to commit..?

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat