> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >>> (except that it probably ought to be moved into x86.)
> >> attached version for x86. is it okay? (tested on amd64 only)
> >>
> >> notice that I didn't add check_pa_acc() prototype to any header in
> >> x86/include because I didn't know where it was appropriate...
> > 
> > i meant to move the most of mem_clusters management code
> > into, say, x86/memcluster.c.
> > (blame me for not doing so when writing i386 version. :-)
> 
> :)
> 
> well that I'd rather not mess with (at least for now); what's the
> verdict on the two patches posted? is either of them okay to commit..?

both are ok for me, as far as tested.

YAMAMOTO Takashi