YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>>>> (except that it probably ought to be moved into x86.)
>>>> attached version for x86. is it okay? (tested on amd64 only)
>>>>
>>>> notice that I didn't add check_pa_acc() prototype to any header in
>>>> x86/include because I didn't know where it was appropriate...
>>> i meant to move the most of mem_clusters management code
>>> into, say, x86/memcluster.c.
>>> (blame me for not doing so when writing i386 version. :-)
>> :)
>>
>> well that I'd rather not mess with (at least for now); what's the
>> verdict on the two patches posted? is either of them okay to commit..?
> 
> both are ok for me, as far as tested.

well, we have to choose only one. :)

which version do you prefer? (I don't mind, but I *think* the x86
version will help us reduce code duplication?)

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat