Port-amd64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: watchdog?



Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Manuel Bouyer 
> <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:41:24AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I also saw docs mentioning that some Intel chipsets have WDT.  But
>>> info is very limited.  Not sure if it's real.
>>
>> They do; some of them even have several:
>> Available watchdog timers:
>>         ipmi0, 0 second period
>>         ichlpcib0, 367 second period
>>
>> ichlpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0: Intel 63xxESB LPC Interface
>> Bridge (rev. 0x09)
>> timecounter: Timecounter "ichlpcib0" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
>> ichlpcib0: 24-bit timer
>> ichlpcib0: TCO (watchdog) timer configured.
>> ipmi0 at mainbus0
>> ipmi0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1
>>
>>
>> Available watchdog timers:
>>         ichlpcib0, 38 second period [armed, user tickle, pid 11]
>> timecounter: Timecounter "ichlpcib0" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
>> ichlpcib0: 24-bit timer
>> ichlpcib0: TCO (watchdog) timer configured.
>>
>>
>> Basically, all hardware I have which has a IPMI BMC includes a ipmi watchdog;
>> and most intel P4 or newer desktop or server I have includes a ichlpcib
>> watchdog.
>
> Nice.  This would be one of the reasons real H/W machines are better
> than VMs; hardware reset effectively resets H/W.
>
> Unfortunately, my customer runs VMware, which have no H/W watchdog
> emulation.  (It has heartbeat as a host-guest IPC (used via vmware
> tools), but I can't use it for administrative reasons...)

It would be cool if xen had a watchdog that was code in the dom0 that
the domU had to poke, so from the domU point of view, it had a real
(virtual) hardware watchdog.

Attachment: pgpbyQwG3YYKM.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index