Port-amiga archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Review article: Comparison NetBSD / Linux for Amiga
On 7 Jan 2000, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > - The NetBSD on the Amiga Unix Compendium CD comes with compiled KDE
> > > packages, Linux m68k does not. Important for the user IMHO!
>
> > Yes, as KDE is crap :-)
>
> Then whats about Gnome?
>
> Point is KDE is quite a comfortable GUI system for Unix IMHO and Gnome - I
> did not see recent versions - also looked quite promising.
Both KDE and Gnome are waaaay too big and slow for m68k.
> Users usually want such stuff... They are not "vi" hackers. Most of them I
> guess ;-).
Both NetBSD and Linux are fringe OSes, unless you know what to use them
for, there is little point installing them. If all you want is a cool
desktop, and a handfull of apps I suggest staying with amiga OS. If the
intention is to learn unix/netbsd/linux then go for it, but be prepared
to read manuals alot, unix are for literal active people.
Kolbjørn Barmen | a3k/o6o/6o4e/AmigaOS/MacOS/LinuxPPC | // T e a m
<kolla%nvg.org@localhost> | a12ooCT/o3o/Linux-m68k a6oo/o3o/AmigaOS | \XX/ A
M I G A
Nettverksgruppa | "I met the Amiga and fell in love..." | <amiga.nvg.org>
»» Norwenglish Undiversity of Technophoby and Silence ««
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index