hello,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:24:19PM -0400, webmaster%datazap.net@localhost wrote:
> Hi Ignatios,
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:42:19 +0200
> > From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > To: port-amiga%netbsd.org@localhost
> > Subject: Re: compiling openssl
> >
> > Hi W. Master,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 07:29:33PM -0400, webmaster%datazap.net@localhost
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ... I have:
> > >
> > > M68060=YES
> > > COPTS+=-O3 -m68060
> > > CFLAGS+=-m68060
> >
> > btw, are you aware that binaries thus created will NOT run on 68020
> > and 68030, because they use floating point instructions that only
> > 68040 and 68060 have available?
>
>
> I was unaware of that, but my feeling is that I would like to make the
> server as fast as possible. This server does take a few hits, take a look
> at http://www.datazap.net/analog/ , and yes 1 Amiga 2000 with a 68060 is
> serving 14 gigs of traffic a day without a problem.
>
> Anyway, compiling some things with COPTS+=-O3 -m68060 seems to have made a
> large differents in performace, and I would really like to compile openssl
> for the 68060 with the packaging system. Right now it only compiles for
> the 68020-40 cpu. Could you let me in on how to get openssl to compile for
> the 68060?
I have no debugged recipe, but after doing "make extract patch" you get a
Configure script in .../pkgsrc/security/openssl/work/openssl that has a
line saying
"NetBSD-m68k" .... -O2 -m68020-40 ...
So...
cd .../pkgsrc/security/openssl; make extract patch; vi work/openssl/Configure
change that line to say -m68060, or (safer) -m68020-60
make
*should* build you a 68060-specialized openssl library.
But I only quickly looked at Configure. You do the testing.
-is
--
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
Attachment:
pgpmzdXsijqeH.pgp
Description: PGP signature