Subject: Re: 2.0 self building
To: None <port-amiga@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@beverly.kleinbus.org>
List: port-amiga
Date: 07/26/2004 08:39:26
--dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
[I reordered the used quotations to make this readable]
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:54:16PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:08:37PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> > With or without X11?
> I've done kernel compiles with or without X by removing it as a limiting
> factor. Re-direct the output messages of the make to a file. [...]=20
> X being active doesn't cause much issue, as the output is not scrolling
> X bitmaps.=20
Yesyes... but I think Matthias wanted to know whether it was 2.5 days
including building X11 or only the base system...
Regards,
-is
--dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFBBKceN4tiz3B8hB0RAlTwAJwMKtx65p3fxfVfDJcq6boyj4sA8ACg5DkB
a/2RLKgR3h3avBSLKkP1V5o=
=B8Tu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9--