Subject: re: /usr/include/machine
To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: port-arm
Date: 07/13/2001 21:28:48
   
   >  biggest pain with machine/param.h is that everything seems to have a 
   > dependancy on it!
   
   IMHO, if machine/param.h can be shared,
   these ports did not have to be split.


indeed.


the whole goal of this should be to produce a way to populate
/usr/include/machine on any arm platform, such that it was virtually
identical to userland.  the only difference should be in what the
<machine/param.h> MACHINE/_MACHINE definitions.


arm <machine/param.h> can include <arm/param_machdep.h> (somehow,
or something) to get these definitions, and you make sure that
this file is MD controlled, or something.  can't be too hard.


.mrg.