On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:42:58AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

 > Shouldn't this be in arch/dnard?  I thought we were trying to get rid of 
 > arch/arm32

Yes, it should, but arch/dnard doesn't build, and repeated inquiries about
what the problem might be to the person who came up with the structure of
arch/dnard (and the way it handles include files, etc.) hasn't made any
difference.

I don't have time to make other people's experiments build properly -- I
need to make progress on this project.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>