On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> The more I think about it, the more I suspect that the final stub into the
> kernel should be coded in ARM code rather than thumb code.  That makes
> this whole issue go away for the normal case, and we should stick to using
> the current technique of normally coding the SWI number in the
> instruction.

Oh good.  In that case, we'll keep the syscall protocol as-is for ELF,
except to change the SWI base to match our shiny new officially-assigned
one, OK?

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>