On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> 2) I think this bit of the packed-enum spec will be cleaned up.  A test I
> ran on gcc yesterday seemed to match the latest draft of the enum spec
> that I have.
>
>   An enumeration that can be represented by both the signed and unsigned
>   versions of a basic type is allocated to a container of the unsigned type.

OK.  That's different from the last copy you sent me, and now matches
GCC's behaviour.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>