Re: Couldn't use Version 3.0.1 of Intel Microcode with the NSLU2

To: port-arm%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Couldn't use Version 3.0.1 of Intel Microcode with the NSLU2
From: Donald T Hayford <don%donhayford.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:54:16 -0500

Donald T Hayford wrote:

I tried to build a version of the kernel (4.99.55) using the latestIntel npe firmware (IxNpeMicrocode.c, V3.0.1, January 7, 2008). Onbootup, I received the following message:
ixpnpe0: imageId 0x01000201 not found in image library header

Incidentally, if you follow the link that is in the readme(src/sys/arch/arm/xscale/ixp425-fw.README) tohttp://www.intel.com/design/network/products/npfamily/ixp400_current.htm,you'll get V2.3.2, which works. If, like a dummy, you search Intel'ssite for IXP425 because you're too lazy to open the readme file, you'llget sent tohttp://www.intel.com/design/network/products/npfamily/download_ixp400.htm,which has V2.4 (works) and V3.0.1 (doesn't work).


My bad,
Don

References:
- Couldn't use Version 3.0.1 of Intel Microcode with the NSLU2
  - From: Donald T Hayford

Prev by Date: Couldn't use Version 3.0.1 of Intel Microcode with the NSLU2
Next by Date: Fwd: evbarm ldscript vs. KERNEL_BASE_PHYS != KERNEL_BASE_VIRT
Previous by Thread: Couldn't use Version 3.0.1 of Intel Microcode with the NSLU2
Next by Thread: Fwd: evbarm ldscript vs. KERNEL_BASE_PHYS != KERNEL_BASE_VIRT
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index