Port-arm archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Gumstix verdex patch
Hi! all,
From: KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara%kk.iij4u.or.jp@localhost>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:28:55 +0900 (JST)
> I almost ended the transplant work of gumstix. (exclude malo(4))
> I am planning to merge it sequentially next week.
> 2. saost(4)'s frequency configure at run-time. Need support both PXA270
> and PXA255. It influence to hpcarm and zaurus and evbarm boards
> (TWINTAIL, VIPER, LUBBOCK) perhaps.
>
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/saost-runtime-config-20090625.diff
committed.
> 3. I misstake sinse 2007/08/21.
> (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/21/0030.html)
> This patch influence to zaurus perhaps.
>
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/gpio-config-20090221.diff
>
committed.
> 4. The peripheral device of pxa might not be able to do an appropriate
> match. It is necessary to confirm the address more. We do not have
> the method of fixing the order of matching the device.
> pxaip_attach_critical() configure some peripheral devices. However
> pxaohci and pxaudc and others can match.
>
>
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/drivers-match-20090221.diff
I thought that the match by not the address but the name was better.
In this case, the unknown address surrounding will be able to match.
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/drivers-match-20090804.diff
I will commit this patch next week.
Thanks,
--
kiyohara
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index