Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Gumstix verdex patch



Hi! all,


From: KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara%kk.iij4u.or.jp@localhost>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:28:55 +0900 (JST)

> I almost ended the transplant work of gumstix.  (exclude malo(4))
> I am planning to merge it sequentially next week.

> 2. saost(4)'s frequency configure at run-time.  Need support both PXA270
>    and PXA255.  It influence to hpcarm and zaurus and evbarm boards
>    (TWINTAIL, VIPER, LUBBOCK) perhaps.
>      
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/saost-runtime-config-20090625.diff

committed.


> 3. I misstake sinse 2007/08/21.
>    (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/21/0030.html)
>    This patch influence to zaurus perhaps.
>      
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/gpio-config-20090221.diff
>   

committed.


> 4. The peripheral device of pxa might not be able to do an appropriate
>    match. It is necessary to confirm the address more.  We do not have
>    the method of fixing the order of matching the device.
>    pxaip_attach_critical() configure some peripheral devices.  However
>    pxaohci and pxaudc and others can match.
> 
>      
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/drivers-match-20090221.diff

I thought that the match by not the address but the name was better.
In this case, the unknown address surrounding will be able to match.

ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/gumstix/drivers-match-20090804.diff

I will commit this patch next week.

Thanks,
--
kiyohara


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index