Re: Utilite Pro vs 10.99.10 current

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 04:57:56AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> I dusted off my Utilite Pro and tried to boot current on it.  It
> didn't work and the troubles probably start somewhere around here:
> 
>   imx6ccm0 at simplebus4: can't find anatop device
> 
> a lot of devices attached later complain that they "couldn't get
> clock" until eventually the kernel dies with
> 
>   panic: cpu_initclocks: no timer registered
> 
> 
> I have a three year old kernel+dtb that boots
> 
>   NetBSD 9.99.77 (UTILITE) #12: Thu Dec 31 22:08:30 MSK 2020
> 
> A more verbose dmesg from that older kernel has:
> 
>   imx6ccm0 at simplebus4imx6ccm0: dummy (none) : 0 Hz
>   imx6ccm0: ckil (none) : 32768 Hz
>   imx6ccm0: ckih (none) : 0 Hz
>   imx6ccm0: osc (none) : 24000000 Hz
>   imx6ccm0: anaclk1 (none) : 0 Hz
>   imx6ccm0: anaclk2 (none) : 0 Hz
> 
> 
> The dmesg from current follows (with [ 1.0000000] timestamp spam
> removed).  Anything I can do to help debug this?  I'm not sure how to
> pass arguments to the kernel to tell it to boot more verbosely (I
> tried setenv bootargs "-v", didn't seem to help).  TIA.

Did you try the new kernel with the old dtb ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--