On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, David Brownlee wrote:

> 	Would there be any sense in creating lib/libc/arch/arm and
> 	at least having the more obviously sharable files shared with
> 	inncludes? It would be a (cheap :) start...

Seems like a good idea to me, though I'm currently up to my eyeballs in
the EtherH driver.  I'm not quite sure how this would (should?) interact
with the "copy-to-libkern" target in the libc Makefile though.  Is
"copy-to-libkern" actually used?

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>