On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, David Brownlee wrote:

> 	It would probably make sense to have another option to swapctl
> 	that would fail silently if the specified files were not found.
>
> 	swap1 would set the option, swap2 would not. That would allow
> 	the right thing to happen on diskless boxes, plus also allow
> 	people to put swap on 'noncritical' filesystems. Any thoughts
> 	for what letter to use? :)

I'll have a "q" please, Bob.

Then swap1 should do:

swapctl -A -t blk
swapctl -A -t noblk -q

and swap2 would stay as-is.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>