Subject: Re: SA & Morley compatibility (was Re: StrongARM comptibility)
To: Ale Terlevich <A.I.Terlevich@durham.ac.uk>
From: Scott Stevens <s.k.stevens@ic.ac.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 10/15/1996 15:39:08
Ale Terlevich writes:
 > 
 > 
 > On Tue, 15 Oct 1996, Scott Stevens wrote:
 > > 
 > > Well the easiest way (used by most ports), is to have a chip specific
 > > section of code and a card specific section that accesses this.
 > > See: ptsc.c sfas.c and csc.c
 >                         ^^^^^^ 
 >   
 >   I wish I could :)

Well I don't think there's any reason why csc.c can't be distributed
(need to check) as all the NDA'd info is in the header files. (Of
course you wouldn't be able to recompile but you might make
intelligent guesses on the register addresses...)

 >  Presumably no news is bad news re. NDA?

What and see...

 > Ale.

Cheers Scott

-- 
Scott Stevens, Network Services Group, Computer Centre, Imperial College
"I just don't trust that machine, man. Look, I know it's old-fashioned,
but I'm from the school that believes, "If God intended us to fly, he
wouldn't have invented Spanish air traffic control"." - Lister, Red Dwarf