Subject: Re: sorry for this "FAQ-question"
To: Thomas Boroske <y0001006@ws.rz.tu-bs.de>
From: Mike Pumford <mpumford@mpc-data.co.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 01/29/1997 09:14:23
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Thomas Boroske wrote:
> In message <Pine.NEB.3.95.970128223015.519A-100000@black-star.demon.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> > On 26 xxx -1 k3050e7@c210.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is it possible to install riscBSD on a 1GB HD after a 512MB ADFS
> > >partition? I havn4t got the new filecore (only RISC OS 3.5), and I don4t
> > >want to boot from a floppy-disc.
> >
> > This should work but the ADFS (RISCOS) partition may have to be slightly
> > smaller than 512MB so that bb_riscbsd can set up the disc for RiscBSD
> > installation. I used an 850MB drive and a 3.2GB drive on RISCOS 3.5 where
> > the ADFS partitions on both disks were below the 512 boudary and
> > the RiscBSD partitions above the 512MB boundary without any problems.
> >
> > Once you are installed the bootloader runs from RISCOS so there is no need
> > for a floppy boot. The catch is a copy of the kernel is required in RISCOS
> > as well as in RiscBSD which can awkward if you are compiling your own
> > kernels.
>
> Sorry, not sure I understood all of it. Does what you say imply that I
> can't use a 2GB drive with, say, 1GB for RiscOS and 1GB for RiscBSD ?
> Note that I have the new filecore (RO 3.7).
With RiscOS 3.7 this is no problem but RiscOS3.5 has the old 512MB limited
filecore so you cannot have a partition >512MB without softloading the
new filecore that comes as standard with 3.6 and 3.7.
Mike