Subject: RE: The Digital Network Appliance Reference Design
To: Neil A. Carson <CARSON@rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: port-arm32
Date: 04/10/1997 10:37:20 
> In many ways, the RiscPC is seriously outdated in comparison to the
> DNA. The bus is much much slower, the CPU slower (and older), the expansion
> system much more primitive, ... The list goes on.
> 
	Maybe I should have said 'elder brother' :) - though isn't the 
	SA110 in the DNA is the same as used in the RiscPC? (Those that
	are fitted with an SA that is)

		David/abs