On Apr 10, 10:37am, David Brownlee wrote:
> Subject: RE: The Digital Network Appliance Reference Design
> > In many ways, the RiscPC is seriously outdated in comparison to the
> > DNA. The bus is much much slower, the CPU slower (and older), the expansion
> > system much more primitive, ... The list goes on.
> >
> 	Maybe I should have said 'elder brother' :) - though isn't the
> 	SA110 in the DNA is the same as used in the RiscPC? (Those that
> 	are fitted with an SA that is)

Nope. Its a 233MHz part. The SA RiscPCs are using 200MHz StrongARMs (speeds
according to the respective web sites)

Cheers

Rob