Subject: Re: Qt already ported?
To: None <Andreas_Wittrock@public.uni-hamburg.de>
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
List: port-arm32
Date: 08/01/1997 09:57:02
> In message <199707311248.NAA09515@sun52.NIS.cambridge>
> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
> =
> > =
> > The correct GNU canonicalization for an ARM based machine running Net=
BSD
> is
> > =
> > arm-unknown-netbsd{version}
> > =
> > I recently installed a change to the official source of config.guess =
to =
> > ensure this happens. In time this will get released into most GNU =
> > packages.
> > =
> > arm32 is what netbsd calls its port to the ARM processor family; it i=
s
> not =
> > what should be returned as the CPU name in the GNU canonical string.
> > =
> > Richard.
> > =
> You're right. In conclusion to this there shoud be made some changes to=
> the behavior of the kernel and 'uname' by the kernelteam or other relev=
ant
> persons, so that 'uname -m' gives 'arm' and not 'arm32', 'uname -s' giv=
es
> 'netbsd', 'uname -v' produces '1.2' (or 1.3, 1.4 for later versions) an=
d
> not the full path to the kernelsources incl. systemname and systemversi=
on.
> And 'uname -r' should give 'A, B, C, etc' depending on the release vers=
ion.
> =
This is not necessary. config.guess has been set up to convert the arm32=
=
port name to the appropriate gnu canonical name. There is no need to =
alter the behaviour of uname.
Richard.