In <Pine.NEB.4.21.9912171502010.753-100000@oblivion.mono.org>
abs@netbsd.org wrote:

> > Somebody should perhaps correct this?
> > 
> 	If someone wants to mail me the diff I'll commit it :)
> 	(They could alway send-pr :)

Some MAKEDEV scripts for the other arch are also broken,
so I will fix them all.

(BTW, "control unit device" should be named like `md0ctl'
 rather than `md0c', which is used as a partition name?)

> > So, is there any compelling reason to use one rather than the other? (For
> > the moment I'm using mfs's).
> 
> 	I believe mfs is easier to setup on demand, and does not use
> 	'wired' memory (can be swapped out).

mfs can be used as only ffs. md can be used for
any filesystem type, like msdosfs.
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp