Subject: Re: Changing kernel base address (was: Re: Heads up: shared arm include files)
To: Mike Pumford <mpumford@black-star.demon.co.uk>
From: Chris Gilbert <chris@paradox.demon.co.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 01/29/2001 22:45:44
On Thursday 25 January 2001  1:24 am, Mike Pumford wrote:
> > How does this get pushed into current?  or should it be sent to tech-kern
> > on the .s v .S thread?
>
> Submit a PR describing the bug along with the patches to fix it. Its also
> worth a posting to tech-kern indicating that you have a patch to solve the
> issue. IIRC the feeling on tech kern is that config should deal with .S and
> .s files identically and that .S is the correct extension for cpp
> preprocessed assembler.
>
> That way the PR should come to someones attention fairly quickly.

Well I did a PR (12051), but I've not spotted a change go into config, and 
the PR seems to have disappeared from the online query-pr interface as well.  
Does this mean it's got lost or refused?  I've had no email on it.

Cheers,
Chris