On Wednesday 14 February 2001  3:10 pm, Jan-Uwe Finck wrote:
> Who is responsible for this, BTW ?

port-maintainer I believe (or whoever patches it/fixes it if they've got PR 
database access)

> I just wonder, because some of those PRs are really old, and others
> should be closed IMO.

Some are very old, and may still be relevant, eg the pmap not doing the 
scheduler locking protocol (whatever that is :)

> Is Mark still resposible for that ?

Probably.

Cheers,
Chris