On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:16:23PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:

 > Hmm.  This assumes you ultimately want to move all the ARM
 > peripheral-controller code over to sys/arch/arm, which only makes sense to
 > me if you're trying to get rid of sys/arch/arm32.  This doesn't seem to be
 > an entirely settled issue yet.

I thought the consensus was to have:

	arch/archidemes
	arch/acornriscpc
	arch/cats
	arch/dnard
	arch/hpcarm
	arch/rc7500

etc. and then to move the ARM CPU code into arch/arm/...?  This only makes
sense if we are indeed moving towards a common MACHINE_ARCH (i.e. using the
same ABI for userland).

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>