Subject: Re: New bootconfig structure proposal
To: None <imago@kabel065011.kabel.utwente.nl>
From: Chris Cowdery <chris@cowdery.demon.co.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 02/17/2001 11:30:27
In message <Pine.NEB.4.30.0102170056060.12690-100000@rangerover.kasbah>
Reinoud Zandijk <imago@kabel065011.kabel.utwente.nl> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> > > Well .... yes.... but is it really favourable ? I mean ... you have to run
> > > a newly build kernel to do that anyway so why not use the new bootloader
> > > then ?
> >
> > Failsafe mechanism? The new bootloader is still under testing and
> > development.
>
> In a way yes... but on the other hand it is known to work now on all
> platforms the old one worked on and more except one RO 3.7 case but i've
> modified my bootloader for that (not tested yet by him yet though).
Presumably me :-)
Where can I get it!
--
________ _ ______ __
/ ____/ /_ _____(_)____ / ____/___ _ ______/ /__ _______ __
/ / / __ \/ ___/ / ___/ / / / __ \ | /| / / __ / _ \/ ___/ / / /
/ /___/ / / / / / (__ ) / /___/ /_/ / |/ |/ / /_/ / __/ / / /_/ /
\____/_/ /_/_/ /_/____/ \____/\____/|__/|__/\__,_/\___/_/ \__, /
/____/
http://www.cowdery.demon.co.uk/